GIK Acoustics. Acoustic Panels and Bass Traps.

Join Our Email List
Email:  
For Email Marketing you can trust
 


GIK Acoustic Panels The standard acoustic panel size just will not fit? GIK is able to provide custom sized panels. Please contact us with size and quantity.
GIK Bass traps GIK can ship your acoustic panels and bass traps worldwide. Click here for more details.
GIK Acoustic Panels Need help with your acoustical room setup? Contact us here.
GIK Bass Traps 100% Money Back Guarantee!

 

Why is Isolation important?
November 2009 Newsletter

GIK Acoustics

GIK Acoustics Presents
Acoustic Class Room

Nov, 2009 - Vol 10, Issue 10
 
In This Issue
Isolation
SPOTLIGHT:Massive Mastering
Join Our Mailing List!
Quick Links
 
Dear Glenn,

Welcome to GIK Acoustics classroom!

From time to time we'll be sending out newsletters to all of you to keep you up to date on a variety of room acoustics topics. Our hope for this
newsletter is that it will help you get a better understanding of how
acoustics work and how you can benefit by treating your rooms. If you have any questions about the information in this (also ideas for topics to cover) or any other issue, please feel free to contact us. The more YOU understand the better YOUR listening environment will be.  Also we will be spot-lighting a room in each newsletter, so if you'd like to show off your room to the world please contact me at glenn.k@gikacoustics.com

Glenn Kuras
 
Isolation

Why is isolation important?  There are a variety of reasons.  The most commonly recognized reason is to stop sound from bothering other people in the house or other people outside the room and the house/building. 
A more important reason is to stop sound from getting INTO the room.  Why is this important?  In a recording live room setting, it's critical to stop sound from contaminating what's being recorded.  In the control/mixing room, home theater, listening room, it's important to keep the noise floor down to a minimum so it's not masking details and limiting the dynamic range of the room/equipment "system." 


Let's look at an example:

Let's say you have a home theater system which is capable of 100db peak output.  In a normal room, the noise floor will usually be say 50db.  Things like HVAC fans, dishwashers running, people walking, sound coming through windows, etc. all contribute to this.  In this case, the maximum dynamic range the room/system can achieve is 50db (100db max minus 50db noise floor where sound will be masked by the noise).
Now, if we build a room and pay attention to the isolation, we can hopefully get the noise floor down to say 20-30db.  If its 30db and we have the same equipment, we now have a maximum dynamic range o 70db (100db max minus the 30db noise floor).  This results in more dynamic range, less need to turn things up as loud to hear small details and harmonics, etc. 

Sound travels between rooms in 2 ways:
-     Through the air
-     Through the structure

Sound travelling through the air is relatively easy to understand.  Any holes you have in the room are sound leaks.  Outlets, switches, can lights, gaps under doors, HVAC ducting, etc. are all excellent sound transmission paths. 
Sound moving through the structure is much less understood.  Sound vibrates your walls, your ceiling, your floor, your tin ducting, etc.  All of those things are connected to other parts of the building.  When they are caused to vibrate by the sound in your room, the other side or what they're connected to also vibrate and recreate that sound in other parts of the building.  Even solid concrete basement floors are a flanking path for sound to get to the rest of the structure. (Flanking is a term used to describe a path by which sound 'goes around' the boundary of the space.)
So, how do we deal with these issues?  The answer is "It depends."  It depends on your budget, your situation, whether the room is already built or not, what your required level of performance is, etc.  Let's look at a scenario:
 
Existing room to be used for a listening room or home theater in a home.  Bedrooms are not directly next to this room but are close enough that sound transmission is an issue.

 
Level 1

-     Insulate the walls.  This is not expensive to do and will give a nice performance gain.  The walls now become absorbers in the bass and also do not transmit mid and high frequencies in either direction.  The walls also now do not ring like a big drum

-     Replace the door to the room with a solid core wood door and add seals to the door.  The door is usually the biggest sound leak in any room.  Hollow core interior doors are horrid blockers of bass energy.

-     Remove the baseboards and use a 50 year Latex caulk or acoustic caulk to caulk the gaps under the drywall (between the drywall and floor) and also caulk the wall to the floor to stop air penetration.


Level 2

-     Level 1 plus

-     Remove the existing outlets and switches and build an MDF "backer box" behind each of them. Have a hole in the top of the box only big enough for the Romex to enter and caulk that.  Replace with old work boxes.  Think about how many holes there are in your room with switches and outlets.  If you can't take down the drywall to build the boxes, at a minimum, use putty pads on the rear and sides of the plastic box to add some mass and seal it up tightly

-     Repeat the above for any can lights in the room.  Make sure to use IC rated cans if you're going to box around them.

-     If you have access, replace any tin ductwork with flex tubing and isolate in an MDF box with 90 degree bends in it. This not only stops sound from getting out but also makes the room much quieter. Consider larger vent diffusers.  HVAC is usually ignored but is extremely important.  Remember, it goes all through the building


Level 3

-     Levels 1 and 2 plus

-     Add a second layer of drywall to the room and use Green Glue between the layers.  This gives tremendous gains in isolation across the spectrum down into the deep bass range.  The additional mass of the drywall stops a good amount of sound by itself.  The Green Glue provides what's called a 'visco-elastic damping layer' between the sheets. 

-     Consider building a plug for any windows in the room.  Make the front something that has mass to it like MDF.  Fill the rear with insulation.  If you have windows recessed into a wall, make the plug small enough to fit in while using some ¾" foam weatherstripping for a seal.  If you don't, then make a 2x2 frame around the window trim and slide the plug around the outside.


Level 4

-     Levels 1-3 plus

-     Work on the floor.  You can either float a floor using Dri-Cor or you can use a specifically designed rubber dampening layer and then another layer of subfloor. You can also add a 3rd layer of gypcrete between the existing floor and the rubber matting.  Remember that the floor joists under you are likely shared with the rest of the structure.  Even with a concrete floor, bass frequencies will transmit through to the other walls of the structure and through the building.

-     Add a separate HVAC system for the room.   Systems called Mini-Splits are relatively cost effective ways to go.  The good ones have running noise levels of 25db.

-     Consider adding a 3rd layer of drywall

-     If you're removing the drywall to accomplish some of this, consider adding RSIC-1 isolation clips and hat channel before replacing the drywall.  This will cost you a couple of inches in room size but will really ratchet up the isolation.  Remember that the other side of those studs is many times drywalled and in another room.  Even with all of our efforts, there will still be some movement.  That entire wall acts like a big woofer.

Stay tuned for our next newsletter where we'll look at how to build a dedicated space from scratch as opposed to addressing an existing space.

SPOTLIGHT: Massive Mastering - John Scrip
MASSIVE Mastering bridges the wide gap between mastering suites that can cost hundreds of dollars per hour and project & demo recording studio mastering setups.  The vision of former JEM Music Complex chief engineer John Scrip, MASSIVE Mastering provides artists an affordable, yet professional quality dedicated digital audio mastering alternative.  A clientele from across the USA and several countries around the world trust their CD premastering to MASSIVE MasterinJohng.

We sat down with John and ask him a few questions.

Q. So John what projects have you been working on lately?

It's coming up on dance show season, so a big increase in editing and compilation.  Other than that, name it - Rock, pop, classical, country, gospel - I've been working on spoken word projects from [ABC Radio's] Paul Harvey, a constant stream of live tracking / mastering from the Schaumburg Youth Orchestra - What a great bunch of kids and a great program that Schaumburg [IL] put together.   Not your typical "school" orchestra - Several international tours, they're actually performing at [Chicago's] Orchestra Hall this summer.  

Lots of international work with the dollar flipped around also, which is great.  This - let's call it a "classic metal" project from New Zealand stands out for some reason - Sonic Altar - If you get a chance and you're into straight-up, fast-driving, Harley riding rock, you'll be hearing from them soon I'm sure.  Young "kids" for lack of a better term - but very polished.  

I'm seeing a trend here - Maybe the talent isn't really getting younger but I'm just getting older...   Lots of stuff from the smaller indie labels too - The larger labels seem to be stepping very carefully with the economy and the indies are going to take over if they don't watch out.  But hey, that's fine.  Some of the cooler stuff I've worked on recently was on those aggressive indie labels that really believe in what they're putting out - Stuff that a lot of the majors wouldn't want to take a chance on. 

Q. So it's not just putting CD's together -

That's most of it, sure - But editing and compiling [performance discs] for professional dance companies - especially ones that have tried to do it themselves with less than wonderful results - Vinyl transfers - I just started with that last year.  Neat stuff sometimes when you get this record in that's the last known remaining unopened copy and the master tapes were lost decades ago or what not.  Tape transfers too.  Sometimes they just want a flat transfer to digital from tape. 

Typical mastering makes up the bulk, but those "related" projects break up the monotony nicely. 

Q. What equipment do you find is "most important" for today's mastering engineer.

Same as it's always been - Monitoring and acoustic control.  I know a lot of people are fond of the old "There are no rules in audio" adage, but either they have no idea or they have wonderful monitoring in a great space.  There are *two* rules I can think of right off the top of my head -- One is that you will only ever hear as well as your monitoring chain allows you to.  The other is that your monitoring chain will only ever be as accurate and consistent as your room allows them to be.   Put the guy with the greatest hearing in the world in front of cheesy speakers and he's not going to be able to do much...    Put him in a bad room and he's going to be taking a best guess.  An educated guess - but a guess nonetheless.   That sounds like Dr. Seuss... 

But the stuff with the knobs on it - "today's mastering engineer" has to be really picky.  The demands are so high and the budgets aren't what they used to be - but the gear hasn't come down in price.  So you have to make sure the gear you choose is going to work well with almost anything.  I have several pieces that I use for "this" sound or "that" sound - When you need a [Manley] Vari-Mu, there's no substitute.  When you want that SSL mix-buss sound, you need that sound.  But you need a "bread and butter" chain that will take on anything you throw at it.  And ever since my first piece of Crane Song gear [the STC-8M compressor], I've added Crane Song to every part of the chain - I have their compressor, the IBIS [Stereo EQ], the HEDD 192 [AD/DA converter] and the Avocet [monitoring DA and controller] calling the shots on the whole thing.  I'm convinced that they can just do no wrong, sonically speaking.  I even had a Flamingo [stereo mic preamp] here for a time - I won't bore you with the details, but I'll tell you - If that thing had stepped controls and line-level inputs, I'd be running mixes through it right now.   True story - I was running mixes through a Flamingo to see what it could do - And don't think I didn't have a long discussion with Dave [Hill] about modifying one at some point.  Great, great stuff though - If I suddenly had to get rid of everything in the chain that didn't say "Crane Song" on it, I wouldn't really find it a compromise. 

In any case, Crane Song, Manley, API, BelCanto, the hot-rodded SSL 4000 clone - It's all ridiculously clean, very quiet stuff with gobs of headroom.  And with the demand for volume at this point in time - as much as I wish it weren't the case - without a lot of headroom, you might as well just throw it away. 

Q. What is the biggest problem you come across these days with mixes being submitted to you?

Too much.  Too much going on, too many effects, too hot on the way in - Too much volume.   A lot of "less seasoned" engineers are convinced that if they don't make everything as loud as possible right off the bat, then the finished product isn't going to be loud.  Loudness aside, it's the perfect way to make sure that it won't have the potential to *be* loud when it's done.  So they track too hot and overdrive the input chain right off the bat and it just goes downhill from there.  If people would pretend that -12 [dBFS] was as hot as anything should go during tracking, their recordings would sound so much better.  And at the mastering stage, they could actually get that volume they want while still retaining some clarity and dynamics. 

That and the trend to "fix it" at the mastering stage.  Some will send in mixes that they're not happy with hoping that I can "fix" them here and it just doesn't work that way.  Ask any mastering engineer - We'd much rather "enhance" a great recording than try to make a bad recording "less bad" - If it's even possible in some cases. 

The funny part of that whole situation is the experience of the engineers in some cases - I'll get in these great sounding projects that are obviously "safe" but very decent sounding from hobbyists that have been at it for less than a year.  I'll get great sounding projects in from engineers who have been full-time industry pros for a decade or more.  But the most problematic projects tend to come in the middle - It's like the "rookies" haven't learned enough to screw anything up, the pros have learned how to get out of the way.  But a lot guys in the middle are the ones with enough rope to hang themselves with.   You know how you learn something new and then you have to do it all the time?  Or you get that new piece of gear that's suddenly never turned off?  Turn it off once in a while.  Get back to the basics - Get the core sounds sounding as amazing as you can, then just get out of their way.   Track at "normal" levels - not "as hot as you can without clipping."  Go ahead and record 5 vocal tracks but you don't have to use them all if the mix doesn't need it.  Use reverb, but once you actually notice it, you're probably using too much.  You can always add more later if you actually need it.

Q. So tell us a little about your room? How are you set up and what kind of acoustics do you have?

I was limited by the existing space quite a bit so took parts of two different rooms and made this one.   It's relatively small, so I knew it was going to need a lot of broadband trapping right off the bat.  I think I started out with 18 traps from you guys then added some custom units and fortified the corners [with GIK Tri-Traps] - I think I'm up to 29 or 30 traps in here now including the clouds.  The floor is floating above concrete except for the front of the room where there's a concrete slab right under the wood flooring where the speakers are.  The walls are doubled-up with compressed insulation and 1-1/2" of plaster on both sides so transmission isn't a problem. 

The last time I had the room shot, we noticed a little comb-filtering from the desk to the ceiling above, so I decided to add a couple [GIK D1] diffusors overhead - I know that's not exactly what they were designed for, but it really made the difference - Opened the high end right up and tweaked the imaging above the [desk] rail better than I would've expected.  So it's really well-controlled, but it's not dead - I hate dead rooms.  


 

CONTACT INFO: MASSIVE Mastering
P.O. Box 68143
Schaumburg, IL 60168
USA
Owner / Engineer:  John Scrip
Office Manager / Booking Coordinator:  Bridget Shepley
Phone (direct studio line):  1.630.237.4393
Fax (office/studio fax):1.630.233.8310
 
http://www.massivemastering.com 
 






 
 

Copyright
© 2010 GIK Acoustics. All Rights Reserved.